[Morning freewrite] I am dreaming about the trail constantly. Anxious dreams. Waking me up in the early morning hours. Dreams that I am off the trail and can't get back on. Dreams of being distracted and ensnared in people's lives (last night someone wanted to play basketball.) I'd rather be hiking. I need to finish my sleeping bag liner so I can get started on my tarp. Yesterday I was going to work on it. I only succeeded in getting it downstairs to find a flat surface to cut on. I don't know what's wrong with me beyond the usual depression thing. I need to overcome the need to do everything exactly right. I need to get to the point in life as well as writing where I can make mistakes. The rain is coming down down down. I've started a short story about it. It was first person and I changed it to second person. I think I may change it back. I'm not sure. My voice is strongly a second person voice. reflective, stream of consciousness, .... I don't know. Second person is like first person. But different. You can know everything that goes on in the "you" of the story's head. So you are second person omniscent. A combination of third person and first person. It's a great voice. But I'm writing about me in this story so perhaps theere's no need to write in that voice.... I'm having problems ending it. Once again, I know where I wnat to go but I'm having troubles making the leap from where I am into that. The transition is the problem. There are ideas that I don't want to come out and say. I want the reader to come to understand it without me having to say so. But it's hard. I have no idea in this case. Perhaps I've spent too much of my life learning how to be blunt. Afterall people never understood me when they used to talk to me. I talk in circles and thoughts that move around subjects. People are used to reaching in and grabbing an idea to throw directly back out at you. It's hard to unlearn years of carefully hoarded communictaion skills. Yet necessary. Because internally I have the need to obfuscate, to examine from different sides; if I ever reach that central idea, I've gone too far. What's the purpose of writing then? You can simply skip to the end. A well crafted work is one in which you ccan see the central idea by the end, but you have never had it mentioned by the author. Reservoir Dogs, do people die or not? Lost Highway, is it circular in time or do we end up with a character who replicates things he thinks have hapened? The Usual Suspects... we are lead along the garden path until the end when we find something different all at once. Where are we? Where are we going? I don't know anymore. Have I ever? Does it bother me? [End morning freewrite] I have arrived at the conclusion that I am not anti-science, anti-rationalist, but that most people do not see the beauty in science and rationalism. Beauty exists in wholes. In being able to wrap your mind around a picture larger than yourself. Most people do not and cannot. We are taught science and math and history and so on as a sequence of little concepts. As pieces of things that we can understand individually. That is part of the scientific method -- reduce problems down into smaller, more managable problems. But in the end, to understand and appreciate the beauty of hte systems we are trying to solve, we have to step back and see the whole picture. We have to see how each intricate piece moves in time with every other piece. We have to transcend our limitations and take in the beauty of the whole. Otherwise, it's just mindless problem solving.